Were the news reporting of priests (molestaions) a liberal media conspiracy? - pre teens being raped
The media were conducted by the Gay & Lesbian Alliance, through its "pro-gay media kits to avoid the label of sexual abuse of young people as a" pedophile "as" homosexual rape "to negatvity associated with the movement Gay rights reserved. Pedophilia is the children, as children from 4 years old, attacked the priests, the preteens and teenagers, known as pedophilia is not correct. It seems that wants to harm the Catholic Church (Liberal) something bad could have other social-liberal promotion of homosexuality compromise. Who in the Socialist army this policy in order to distort the crimes designed?
Friday, January 29, 2010
Pre Teens Being Raped Were The News Reporting Of Priests (molestaions) A Liberal Media Conspiracy?
6 comments:
Are you kidding? I want to know where you live. I am interested in your name. I just want to know where you live, so you can make sure I never move my family.
I do not know how this age group were children. They were young, you know? The children were abused by priests. Made. It is like saying: not so bad that instead of a .44 Magnum used to kill someone, you use only one kill for the .38 Special. Big deal. They are still dead and still be killed and is still a crime.
I think, have given the Gay & Lesbian Alliance some concern that this priest has right () the media attention she attracted deserved. The reason is that they are good, honorable and honest people who want no part of their sexual orientation in this disgusting pedophile, as if it was an aberration. Disgusting religious fanatics think it's probably OK to annoy teenagers and preteens, but it is good that want to have people who have sex with men.
Therefore, we no longer practicethe nature and organized religion. Because people like you.
How do they want to have sex with pre-adolescents is not pedophilia? And most of them were teenagers when the abuse.
Edit - OK, now I understand your position better. We hope you find these more sensitive
Probably not true that the attacks were reported as child abuse, not the program for gay rights damages.
Were reported as child abuse, because they were the focus of attacks figures of authority, abuse of children, authority figures to avoid violation of the same sex.
Moreover, it is only because the injury is pedophilia. They were victims of the age of consensus, they have either to the priest in that case refused to have consented to any action or, in the gay sex, but rape is not gay.
Moreover, not liberals, but also politicians and / or people with causes that to exploit tragedies, etc. for promoting their cause. For example, in major speeches by Bush, nearly always at hand and draws attention to a family member of a victim of 9 / 11.
Yes, and Iraq is now Disney World, when trying to lib conspiracy to convince people that we are losing ...
/ Sarcasm
What do you have? Many of these priests allowed! Do you think part of the Roman Catholic Church is willing to gay with millions of dollars in these cases because of a conspiracy? And what in the world have a political label to do with it? Password conservative criminals like Foley or Haggard (spelling?) This is not a political issue. Go sell your ignorance elsewhere.
Well, first I would not think that the media is so liberal, he receives orders from the Gay and Lesbian Alliance. And there is much negativity surrounding the movement of gay rights that have little or nothing to do with abusing priests are not. I've never been in a group "promoting homosexuality".
Secondly, the victims of sexual abuse by priests are about twice as male and female half (see above), which would disregard anything about the "homosexual rape" and what is, in fact, pedophilia.
Third, despite what you think the word may be, the word "pedophilia" refers to any child under U.S. law, persons under 18 years. And for your information, according to the reported cases, the average age of a child if he or she was abused by a priest is 9th It seems certain that promotes pedophilia, even under the partial view of the world.
And finally, voting in all reports and studies of pedophiles, or even those who are victims of sexually to adults, therapists and experts, that violence is rarely, if ever, on grounds of sex. This is power, and POWho was something the priests especially impressive, especially for children - Catholic priests have been and are capable of unique and very long (even today, as some say) had a set-up where he could abuse more children without fear of arrest or prosecuted or even lose their jobs.
I am afraid your argument is unfounded.
As a liberal, I am not against organized religion.
I'm not religious, but not in this way. This does not mean I'm immoral or no value.
The Liberals are critical thinkers, or at least some of us.
Some people use organized religion as a means to isolate from others or to stir up their hatred of diversity. I could be personalized examples.
Let me say: on one side of my new family is the religious and the other party does not. The camp is not religious are more generous, children, the more compassion and less dysfunctional than the other. I've heard more stories to support what I personally experienced.
I am tolerant. I know that my experience can be generalized to the population as a whole.
Homosexuals are not the problem. The people are the problem.
The way the Catholic Church maintained the problem is abhorrent and criminal. If you have not the moral exercise!
The hypocrites are in total and complete.
I do not agree with the Catholic Church on most issues, I'm sure. But I am not against them. I'm not necessarily want to see abolished.
Liberal thinkers, who live in the real world. We are not blinded by ideology. We know that our beliefs May not reflect the real world. We are looking for a fact. We're not in love with our view. Not always think they are right. We are willing to change his mind if there are good reasons and facts tend to our mistakes. We know that no one can know everything and is always right.
We practice what we religious beliefs. We are not hypocrites. But we are perfect. All liberals are not equal. I support the well-educated, intelligent, liberal and intelligent.
Post a Comment